Sharps Safety Culture: Moving Beyond Policies to Practical Change

The Limits of Policy-Driven Safety

Despite decades of regulatory progress, needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs) remain one of the most persistent and underreported occupational hazards in healthcare. Many institutions have implemented robust protocols, mandatory trainings, and exposure control plans, but compliance remains inconsistent. Injuries continue to occur, often under circumstances where the rules were technically known but practically sidelined.

This gap underscores the limits of policy alone. Staff may complete required training yet revert to unsafe habits in high-pressure moments, especially if safety tools are inconvenient or unintuitive. Compliance fatigue is also a growing concern. When clinicians are repeatedly exposed to new mandates without meaningful engagement, adherence becomes superficial, a box to check rather than a behavior to internalize. Additionally, when staff are not involved in evaluating or selecting safety devices, adoption is often half-hearted, particularly if the device interferes with clinical efficiency [1][2].

Why Culture Change Is Essential

Policies create the framework, but culture determines how, when, and whether those policies are followed. A true culture of safety must go beyond annual trainings or administrative oversight. It should empower clinicians at every level to act as both users and stewards of safe practice.

In such a culture, reporting is normalized rather than feared. Clinicians understand that reporting NSIs or near-misses is a professional contribution, not an admission of incompetence. Leadership plays a crucial role: when managers and senior clinicians visibly prioritize safety, it signals to staff that safety is not optional, it is integral to clinical excellence. Equally important is staff ownership. When frontline clinicians are engaged in the selection, feedback, and refinement of safety protocols and tools, they are more likely to champion and uphold them [3][4].

The Role of Intuitive Tools

Sustainable behavior change depends not just on training but on design. Tools that reduce the mental and physical burden of performing safely are essential to making best practices stick. Recent research emphasizes that intuitive, well-integrated safety devices have a measurable impact on sharps injury prevention, not only because they minimize exposure risk, but because they remove friction from the process of staying safe [5].

One example is HypoHolder, a Class I FDA-registered device developed by KODA Ideaworks. HypoHolder enables safe, one-handed uncapping, recapping, and disposal of hypodermic needles. Designed for use in fast-paced, high-risk environments like operating rooms and field clinics, it supports compliance by making the safest behavior also the simplest. It integrates seamlessly into existing workflows and requires minimal training, which increases sustained adoption among frontline users.

Bridging the Gap Between Protocol and Practice

At a major academic medical center, surgical staff piloted HypoHolder in the perioperative setting. Despite no major changes to institutional policy, injury rates declined. More importantly, clinicians reported greater confidence handling needles under pressure and described the device as “instinctive” and “immediately usable.” These results suggest that when engineering solutions reduce effort, safety shifts from obligation to instinct.

Real change happens when the safest action becomes the easiest to perform. Tools that reduce the steps needed to comply make a difference, not only in adherence but in mindset. As devices become more intuitive, resistance declines, and best practices become automatic.

Sustaining Culture Through Practice

Healthcare organizations seeking to reduce NSIs must view cultural reinforcement as a continual process, not a one-time campaign. This includes involving staff in device evaluation, recognizing safety “champions” who model consistent behavior, and streamlining tools to match real-world demands.

Institutions must also create space for meaningful feedback. When staff see that their concerns and insights are acted upon, whether through product selection, training updates, or policy refinements, they develop a sense of ownership. Over time, this builds a foundation of mutual accountability that no checklist can replicate.

Building Safety That Lasts

Culture change is not a poster on the wall, it is the daily lived experience of clinicians empowered by tools and supported by leadership. The gap between policy and practice narrows when safety becomes second nature, embedded into how work is done. Devices like HypoHolder don’t replace policy, they fulfill it, helping transform safety from a bureaucratic expectation into a behavioral norm. In doing so, healthcare systems not only prevent injuries, they build cultures that last.

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

References

[1] PMC. (2025). Confronting needlestick and sharp injuries in healthcare. BMC Health Services Research. [2] CDC. (2023). Sharps injury prevention: Moving beyond compliance. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/sharpssafety
[3] ANA. (2022). Creating a Culture of Safety in Nursing. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org
[4] AHRQ. (2021). Safety Culture Assessment and Improvement. Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov
[5] CardinalHealth. (n.d.). Fresh tools, talking points drive sharps safety culture shift. Retrieved from https://www.cardinalhealth.com