The Hidden Threat Facing Military Medics and Field Teams

In combat and emergency medical settings, military medics are required to deliver high-stakes interventions under intense pressure. The risk of needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs) in these environments is substantial, yet it remains largely invisible due to significant underreporting, logistical constraints, and cultural reluctance. The result is a hidden occupational threat with consequences that extend beyond the individual medic to impact operational readiness and mission execution.

‍

Underreported Risk in Military Medicine

Sharps injuries in military contexts occur frequently but are often left undocumented. Operational stress, chaotic environments, and the constant urgency of battlefield care contribute to elevated risk, while the same factors make systematic reporting difficult. Medics frequently work in low-light, high-noise, and physically unstable conditions. These settings demand improvisation and rapid decision-making, often under fire, with minimal regard for standard safety protocols. The pressure to maintain momentum during evacuations or mass casualty triage further reduces the likelihood that an NSI will be formally acknowledged or reported.

‍

Multiple studies have demonstrated that NSI underreporting rates are significant, with estimates ranging from 30% to over 50% depending on the setting. In combat environments, these figures are likely much higher, especially when considering the added complication of transitory deployment structures, lack of electronic documentation systems, and deeply embedded cultural stigmas around injury disclosure [1][2].

‍

Environmental and Operational Hazards

Military field medicine introduces risks not commonly encountered in civilian clinical care. Environmental hazards, such as blowing sand, limited visibility, extreme temperatures, and unstable ground surfaces, create circumstances where accidental sticks are more likely. In addition, medics often operate without reliable access to sharps containers or protective equipment, and manual recapping remains prevalent out of necessity. The physical burden of PPE in austere conditions, combined with outdated or improvised instruments, increases both exposure risk and the cognitive load on providers.

‍

The consequences of these exposures are far-reaching. Medics treating trauma cases in battlefield conditions may come into contact with large volumes of blood and bodily fluids, compounding the danger of NSIs. Even when exposures do occur, reporting may be suppressed due to concern about being removed from duty, fear of administrative scrutiny, or avoidance of triggering additional evaluations that might jeopardize their deployment status. This suppression perpetuates a cycle of underreporting and missed intervention.

‍

Health, Readiness, and Mission Risk

Unreported NSIs carry profound implications. Bloodborne pathogen exposure, including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV, remains a serious clinical risk. When exposures are not acknowledged or treated promptly, seroconversion becomes a preventable hazard. From a readiness perspective, untreated NSIs may sideline personnel unexpectedly or lead to post-deployment complications that affect retention, recovery, and the future availability of trained medics. The long-term financial burden includes direct treatment costs, delayed workforce reintegration, and downstream effects on unit cohesion and capability.

‍

Field-Adapted Safety Strategies

Mitigating NSI risk in combat medicine requires the adoption of durable, operationally feasible solutions. Safety-engineered devices designed for field use offer one clear path forward. HypoHolder, a Class I FDA-registered device developed by KODA Ideaworks, is one such tool. It enables safe, one-handed needle handling during uncapping, recapping, and disposal, an essential innovation in environments where medics may be operating with one hand occupied or where standard containers are unavailable. Its compact size and sterile insert system make it suitable for deployment in a wide range of field kits.

‍

Beyond technology, prevention also depends on updated protocols and training that reflect the realities of field care. Reporting systems must be simplified and digitized where possible. Non-punitive reporting policies should be clearly communicated, with assurance that medics will not face removal or penalty for disclosing injuries. Field training exercises should include sharps safety scenarios tailored to combat conditions, emphasizing both procedural protection and post-exposure support.

‍

Mission Safety Begins with Sharps Safety

Sharps injuries are not merely technical hazards, they represent an unspoken risk that silently threatens the health and effectiveness of military medical teams. Their underreporting and inadequate prevention undermine not only the safety of individual medics but also the operational integrity of deployed units.

‍

To correct this, safety must be treated as mission-critical. That means equipping medics with tools designed for the battlefield, building reporting protocols that function in the field, and fostering a culture that protects the well-being of those who serve. Only then can the military medical system break the silence around NSIs and truly support the professionals on the front line.