Hidden Dangers Behind the Uniform

Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are an occupational hazard recognized across all health care environments, but in military medical settings, the real scope of the issue is often obscured by underreporting. Patterns documented in both civilian and military literature suggest that while frontline exposure remains high, the data fails to reflect the full scale of the problem, compromising prevention efforts and readiness.

‍

Culture of Silence Impedes Risk Visibility

In military health systems, resilience and self‑reliance are deeply ingrained values. Unfortunately, these traits can become barriers to safety when clinicians and medics hesitate to report NSIs, fearing it may be seen as a sign of weakness or poor decision-making. Administrative concerns, such as deployment status or career impact, further discourage reporting. As in other settings, many personnel normalize sharps exposure as “just part of the job,” reflecting a broader reluctance to engage with reporting protocols or seek help [1]

‍

Operational Realities Exacerbate Underreporting

The unique logistics of military medicine, field hospitals, mobile units, and high-tempo operations, often limit access to formal reporting systems. Paper-based logs or electronic health systems may be unavailable or secondary to mission demands. Without streamlined pathways for documentation, even well-intentioned clinicians may omit incidents simply because the process is too cumbersome or delayed [1]. Evidence comparing military and civilian facilities reinforces that underreporting in military contexts can equal or exceed that seen elsewhere [2]

‍

The Cost of Invisibly Sustained Harm

When NSIs go untracked, opportunities for early intervention, such as post-exposure prophylaxis, are lost, endangering both individual providers and mission readiness. Without accurate data, leadership cannot assess risk patterns or target preventive measures. The hidden burden of NSIs includes long-term medical costs, worsening well-being, and decreased staffing resilience.

‍

Bridging Policy and Practice

Military healthcare systems must modernize reporting mechanisms. Adoption of mobile-enabled reporting tools, or integration of incident logging into field-ready electronic health systems, can reduce administrative friction. Repeated training, from garrison to deployment, can reinforce why and how every NSI must be reported. Clear, updated Department of Defense policy is critical, ensuring that reporting is nonpunitive and prioritized alongside mission success.

‍

Leaders play a critical role. When senior clinicians and command personnel affirm that reporting is a sign of professionalism, not fault, and act transparently on lessons learned, culture shifts swiftly.

‍

Supporting Safety Through Engineering Innovation

While reporting systems capture data, engineering controls prevent injuries. Tools like HypoHolder, a Class I FDA‑registered device featuring a magnetic base and sterile insert, enable safe, single-handed uncapping, recapping, and disposal of needles. Developed by clinicians familiar with operational pressures, it reduces reliance on two-handed techniques and supports both individual safety and institutional compliance with best practices.

‍

Duty to Report, Duty to Prevent

Protecting those who serve means recognizing that NSIs in military settings are often unseen but deeply consequential. Addressing underreporting requires robust policy, accessible tools, and leadership that models transparency and action. By coupling culture change with sensible safety innovations, military medicine can deliver on its sacred promise: to care for the caregivers.

‍